Here is a list of my papers:
2025
- Köhler, S. & Veluwenkamp, H. (2025), Conceptual Ethics and the Ethics of Implementation: Case for Divorce? Synthese, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-025-05231-z.
- Köhler, S. & Veluwenkamp, H. (2025), Proper Foundations for Conceptual Ethics, Synthese, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05175-4.
- Löhr, G. & Veluwenkamp, H. (2025), Rethinking philosophical methodology: Conceptual engineering meets Value Sensitive Design, Metaphilosophy, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12730.
- Buijsman, S. & Veluwenkamp, H. (forthcoming), Measuring the right thing: justifying metrics in AI impact assessments, in Global Perspectives on AI Impact Assessment (Oxford University Press), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05007.
- Veluwenkamp, H. (2025), What Responsibility Gaps Are and What They Should Be, Ethics and Information Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09823-8.
- Veluwenkamp, H. & Buijsman, S. (2025), Design for Operator Contestability: Control over Autonomous Systems by Introducing Defeaters, AI and Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00657-0.
- Köhler, S., Mecacci, G. & Veluwenkamp, H. (2025), Responsibly Engineering CONTROL, American Philosophical Quarterly (pre-print version).
2024
- Veluwenkamp, H. & Hindriks, F. (2024), Artificial Agents: Moral Responsibility & Control Gaps, Inquiry.
- Veluwenkamp, H., Hopster, J., Köhler, S. & Löhr, G. (2024), Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering, Ethics and Information Technology.
- Veluwenkamp, H. (2024), Impactful Conceptual Engineering: Designing Technological Artefacts Ethically, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-024-10459-8.
- Köhler, S. & Veluwenkamp, H. (2024), Conceptual Engineering: For What Matters, Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzad064
2023
- Veluwenkamp, H. & Van den Hoven, J. (2023), Design for Values and Conceptual Engineering, Ethics & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09675-6 (pre-published version)
- Hindriks, F. & Veluwenkamp, H.(2023), The Risks of Autonomous Machines: From Responsibility Gaps to Control Gaps, Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04001-5
- Cavalcante Siebert, L., Lupetti, M. L., Aizenberg, E., Beckers, N., Zgonnikov, A., Veluwenkamp, H., Abbink, D., Giaccardi, E., Houben, G.-J., & Jonker, C. M. (2022). Meaningful human control: Actionable properties for AI system development. AI and Ethics, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00167-3.
2022
- Veluwenkamp, H. (2022), Reasons for Meaningful Human Control. Ethics & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09673-8
- Veluwenkamp, H., Capasso, M., Maas, J., & Marin, L. (2022). Technology as Driver for Morally Motivated Conceptual Engineering. Philosophy & Technology, 35(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00565-9
- Buijsman, S., & Veluwenkamp, H. (2022). Spotting When Algorithms Are Wrong. Minds and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09591-0
2021
- Veluwenkamp, H. Inferentialist Truth Pluralism. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 24, 107–121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10145-5
2017
- Veluwenkamp, H. Parfit’s and Scanlon’s Non-Metaphysical Moral Realism as Alethic Pluralism. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 20, 751–761 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9801-6
- Dutilh Novaes, C. and Veluwenkamp, H. (2017), Reasoning Biases, Non-Monotonic Logics and Belief Revision. Theoria, 83: 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12108
Other published work:
- Tech Philosophers Explain The Bigger Issues With Digital Platforms, And Some Ways Forward, 3 Quarks Daily, 2021 (with Delft’s Digital Philosophy Group).
- Review of Philosophy in the age of science? (in Prometheus)
Several papers are under review considering the following subjects (papers available upon request):
- Ethics of technology
- Designing robots that do not deceive and can be held to norms (with Daphne Brandenburg)
- How concepts are disrupted by technologies.
- Value Sensitive Conceptual Design
- Contestability for Operators
- Different ways of understanding Responsibility Gaps
- Metaethics
- The problem of semantic access for moral non-naturalists.
- Existing solutions to the Problem of Creeping Minimalism fail and a suggestion for a new solution.
- Deliberative indispensability arguments.
- The problem of semantic access and its consequences for antirealists’ options for satisfying objectivity.
Papers on the following topics are in beta (drafts available or available soon):
- A paper applying the normative functions account to artifact functions